This is more a rant than anything else, and a bit faraway from the dialogue of hiking, and hiking clothes for girls. Yes I'd love to start a clothing firm of my own which would also have it’s personal “social mission” so to speak. Clothing firms aims are earning profits by targeting girls. In the method the vast majority of clothes companies make the world worse for women. It is as whether it is an agenda towards girls. Probably most women’s types are designed and conceptualized by men from the drawing board to the final sewing together of the apparel item. The few ladies who are in the women’s clothes design business apparently are doing little or nothing to instigate a pattern toward higher clothes designs for ladies who want practicality, dignity and function of their clothes. And that's the place the dilemma comes in for a lot of women who don’t care about “Looking younger” or “Being girly.” Ladies who just want purposeful, comfy clothes are truly underrepresented . Sure, a lot of people would say “Not so. Since a variety of low-rise or pores and skin-tight jeans, and cleavage-revealing shirts and crotch-length shorts, and tastelessly-quick skirts are the type of clothes that in all probability the vast majority of girls purchase (judging by the prominence and availability of such clothing) , then it means these are the kinds that can proceed to be manufactured and furthermore these kinds of “feminine styles” will make their manner into all sorts of women’s clothes, even those that are purported to be for operate not vogue. ” So their women’s shirts are designed with “princess seams” and curve-enhancing stitches and so on. It is not the one clothes firm that makes “active-women’s wear” that incorporates fashion into perform. It brings us back to the place we began. As fairly a couple of women who posted here on “Hiking Lady” have stated, they resort to men’s clothes for higher match, higher comfort, better freedom of movement and higher durability. I'd say that usually unisex sizing is one of the best approach to go together with some features that would assist accommodate people who may need a bit more hip or stomach (both women and men). The majority of women’s “active wear” just don’t have it. ’s clothes. Men’s sizes are larger even in terms of “small” sizes for men. I doubt this is inconceivable. Basically, women can fit into men’s clothing this way. The scrubs had been provided by the facility. I lately was working in a analysis facility and was required to put on scrubs. I informed her that when it comes to scrubs, a measurement small pant doesn't match me and it is strange because most small-size men’s pants match me. The provision person mentioned she thought a size small would fit me. The availability person mentioned that it is as a result of women have hips and men don’t. I advised her that plainly a variety of small-sized males would discover it onerous to slot in most small-sized scrubs too. What a lot of people seem to overlook is that some men do have pretty-distinguished hips and nearly all of men’s clothes are meant for men with completely straight hips. Actually when males get older, in their 40s they very often develop bigger hips. Years ago, I recall a radio business for a special kind of Levis denims which were meant for older males and it was said that the options had more room in the hip and thigh. Yet males have a greater deal when it comes to clothes. Women’s clothing is at all times made to include style reasonably than perform. EMS and REI and Sierra Buying and selling Submit, and Moosejaw, and Cabela’s and Sportsman’s Information, and numerous different such shops, or online stores have some of the better sorts of clothing meant for hiking and other outdoor activities. Brands equivalent to Ex-Officio, Arctryx, The North Face, Sherpa, Marmot, Mammut, Mountain Hardwear, Columbia and numerous others. These manufacturers are likely to have the best possible materials, and the most effective features. They've the best mixture of fabrics so as to be lightweight as attainable for scorching days and which might protect in chilly days without a lot of bulk. They are inclined to have SPF in-built to protect the wearer from the sun’s rays. I had to make use of a large measurement to have room for my shoulders and arms however then the a part of the jacket that was beneath the waist bellowed out and simply was uncomfortable to wear and just had a very awkward look to it. But, I've seen such absurdly-cut jackets for women by The North Face. It was “merely” meant to enhance the feminine type whereas being “useful” for outdoor activity, or that is what the designers had in thoughts and but I need to surprise what they were pondering by making a jacket like this. It felt tight and limiting when i moved. I don’t know the way it ever got manufactured and doubtless hundreds have been made and it gave the impression to be a waste of time and materials and it seemed as if the “quality management people” missed some major design flaws. I want I wrote down the fashion quantity in order that maybe I could discover a link to it in the web and possibly you all can see for your self. There are other women’s energetic wear that is probably not as excessive however which still have enough lack of operate so that the majority energetic girls just can not use them. The Gap and Previous Navy aren't notably for lively put on however they have small line of such clothing. I feel that they are awful in material and design. The Gap, Old Navy, Modell’s, Goal, Ok-Mart and different such stores, essentially solely have clothes made of cotton ( with a number of exceptions). Modell’s is imagined to be a “sports store” nevertheless it carries train clothing for ladies which is made by Nike, Addidas (and so on) and though these are well-identified brand names, I find that they really put an excessive amount of trend into clothes on the expense of operate. They went out of enterprise years ago but they also had clothes for ladies that I discovered to be impractically designed. In New York Metropolis the place I reside there is one REI and two EMSs and one not-as-nicely-known store in decrease Manhattan which sells all kinds of outdoor/camping/hiking tools and clothes. There was once a store in NYC referred to as Herman’s and another referred to as Robbin’s. Removed from it. I've seen women in these shops talking to sales associates and saying that they have seemed in every single place for extra practical designs . There may be an organization that a whole lot of you in all probability have heard of called “Title 9.” They strictly make women’s active put on. There are various Modell’s and one Sports Authority, and a few Outdated Navy’s and It would seem that there are a lot of shops that will have something for each woman. Guess what? It doesn’t work. The majority of their types are meant to “enhance figures” and make the wearer “look feminine” whereas taking part in sports or partaking in rugged outdoor actions. Why do I at all times notice that the clothes that come the closest to being purposeful and rugged and practical are the ones which might be discontinued and replaced by those who aren’t? Their women’s bathing fits are really ineffective. They are meant for girls who've good figures , even who're professional fashions and the bathing suits are sexist for my part. They may continue a sure type for several seasons or they might substitute the type and by no means revive it. Why ought to any bathing swimsuit be “hi-cut” or like a thong and the top be meant to reveal cleavage? Title 9 has had certain kinds of designs known as “Grab and Go” that means that the clothes are so practically designed that you can just seize them, throw them on, and walk out the door to exercise or do anything. Are you going to go swimming or browsing , or are you going to work in a “gentleman’s club” ? I want that it was as advertised to be. Throughout my life I have gone from store to retailer throughout certain occasions of the yr on the lookout for the most effective rugged and practical clothes for winter or summer time. It's always hard to search out anything close to what I need. It usually goes for sneakers and slippers and other footwear too. I often need to take whatever comes closest and that's often within the men’s section. There are designs which I'll go to my grave scratching my head over concerning why they have been made the best way they were.. I once found some snug slip-ons made by Teva. However the absurd thing was that the soles had been designed with fairly-deep grooves that have been very intently spaced and they have been throughout the sole . Simply why aren’t sneakers and footwear made to be cleaned? They're the principle piece of clothes that shall be touching the ground and going by way of all sorts of disgusting stuff. I have had a fantasy of designing shoes which can be meant to be cleaned and are simple to wash. I can’t for the life of me perceive why such a design was made. To enable climbing on rocky or uneven surfaces, and yet it doesn't work on any type of foot wear like it works on a Jeep’s tires. I do know that hiking boot soles are made like a Jeep’s tires are made. Why hasn’t any clothes producer observed this? With footwear, small rocks and mud and leaves and branches (and so forth) get stuck within the grooves of hiking boot soles. With a Jeep’s wheels, the fixed and intense rolling of the tires means that a variety of the debris will probably be hurled off. No human can create that sort of bodily pressure to repeatedly drive the mud and pebbles and debris to be hurled out of the shoe’s soles. The best way that the grooves are designed it solely makes the soles hard to wash. It implies that the grooves on the soles of hiking boots might be filled up with debris and would not help much in helping the wearer to successfully climb; that is if the grooves on the soles of hiking boots are actually meant to allow the wearer to climb. It seems to me that if the soles are made from rubber there isn’t a need for such elaborately designed grooves that only accumulate dirt. I'm wondering why there aren’t chemists and clothing technicians working on a greater form of rubber that grips on all surfaces or grips higher on rocky surfaces or wherever hiking footwear are used, and it would make it unnecessary to make grooves on the soles of sneakers. I've seen some unusual designs that don't contribute to perform. It appears to me that grooves are simply placed on the soles of sneakers for trend purposes. This goes for sneakers too. Loads of sneakers which can be good in design in other methods, have very impractically designed soles. So far as sweatpants , scrub pants , and other such sorts of pants, there are bra and leggings these which have “elastic waist” or “comfort waist” and there are those with drawstrings. After all I am not an knowledgeable in making footwear or shoe-soles and i could possibly be improper , however I am enough of an professional in sporting sneakers meant for lively lifestyles and I believe that loads of shoe manufacturers are focusing on the unsuitable thing. I'm wondering why any pant is designed with a drawstring when an elastic waist would make it pointless . Now-a-days a majority of drawstring-waist are made in order that the drawstring is stitched into the again of the pants waist space. I hate anything with a drawstring waist. I feel it makes the drawstring less effective and it defeats the aim of the drawstring. Underwear: I've been in stores corresponding to K-Mart and Goal the place there are a big variety of women’s underwear. It is difficult to search out the kind of briefs that most of our grandmothers used to wear, not “hi-cuts,” not ” boy shorts,” not thongs. All are horrible in my opinion. I desire consolation, durability and simple-care. All that doesn't converse for me. Anything that gets stuck you-know-where is unacceptable. I've been in the underwear part of department shops and other stores (I have to admit I never appeared in Victoria’s Secret however I don’t anticipate to seek out anything sensible there), and I have seen older ladies looking for one thing that's age-appropriate and dignified and , again, sensible. There may be little other than those hello-cuts. See one of many links beneath for an article about the historical past of women’s underwear. Even “briefs” should not modest enough. It seems it has always been about physically limiting ladies. That’s the best way I take a look at it. Also one of the links under lead to an article about how there will likely be a women’s like of clothing which will likely be impressed by “Barbie.” Isn’t this 2014? It implies that the elastic is sewn into the “hem” of the legs and waist. The closest I've found to what I prefer is a sure Jockey model transient “Elance.” It has “banded” legs and waist which is the better sort of design to get. Elastic that's merely sewn ONTO the waist and legs tends to be less rugged and the stitching can come undone extra simply . I have to order a dimension larger than I normally would so that the waist wouldn't be too tight. One main flaw with “Elance” is that the waist is designed to be tight. And, I don’t perceive the true purpose of “athletic bras” the way they are designed. I sure don’t care about “standing out.” ( I actually don’t in any case, and i don’t care). Bras meant for lively lifestyles should hold them in, nothing extra. I've heard of bras meant to “lift and separate.” I have seen some feminine runners who seem like prime heavy and still they are very quick but I ponder if they will develop again problems later in life. I know that I is probably not addressing the wants of ladies born with sure sizes, or who've particular wants reminiscent of after surgical procedure, but sport bras needs to be made to have sufficient snug tension to prevent bouncing. There may be a necessity for bras that do what some jock straps are purported to do. I want to design shirts and vests with tension built into the right space that might make bras pointless. It would be fantastic for warmer weather and for simplicity, so that you don’t need to hassle with attaching a bra and then a shirt. Simply keep “them” from transferring. Just slip into your shirt (and other clothes ) and you'll exit to walk , jog or no matter. Why isn’t there such a thing? I believe I mentioned in one of my previous posts that Coolibar had a reasonably good pant for women known as Sun Pant. I am certain lots of ladies would need such forms of clothes. I then put in an elastic band to offer extra tension because the waist band would be a bit too giant in any other case, and the pant is practically a dream. I did have to alter the waist myself by taking out the drawstring which involved reducing into the again of the waistband area because the drawstring was sewn into that area. It is vitally practical for a number of activities. It is not so long that the hem drags on the flooring. It isn't for very very popular weather but that can rely by yourself potential to tolerate sizzling weather. It's of a material mix that is not like cotton. All pants ought to have pockets, but typically the best way the pockets are designed make them useless anyway. I discover it is a really particular person factor. This is how most hiking pants must be designed. It is a teensy bit too dense for highly regarded weather very much like the unique Coolibar Sun Pant. It is supposed to be used with a belt but I discover that I don’t need one to wear this pant. I discovered a pant on Cabela’s that's for males, however which matches effectively and it is named “The utility Pant” (see one of many final two links below). It stretches a bit so it does not get tight if you bend or move. In fact not everybody has the identical determine as I do so others may need a distinct opinion. However on the whole this is a good type of pant . In case you do like it you must write to the company and inform them to cling on these pants. One flaw with this pant is that the front pockets are designed so because the openings are slits virtually utterly parallel with the waist. I think they'll discontinue it so that you might want to offer it a attempt. The material stretches so it's not as dangerous as if it have been with denims with these sorts of pockets. It's an impractical design and i don’t know why clothes designers make pant pockets like this. With these kinds of pockets it's important to maneuver your fingers in a extra unnatural means and even carry the hem of your shirt to place your palms in your entrance pants pockets. It needs to be for fashion, nothing else. Pockets needs to be a line down the thigh, or a diagonal line is nice too. It's a good suggestion to have zippered pockets. Anybody who has ever gotten his/her open pocket stuck on a door knob or the handlebar of a bike while passing by too close will know what I imply. But sometimes zippers may cause scrapes to the back of the hand when you set your hands in. There's a need to design zippers of non-scraping material for this function. There can be one other men’s pant from Columbia. I believe I mentioned them before (see one in all the 2 links below). Why aren’t any clothing designers working on this? They're of an excellent materials for sizzling days, however for me, I discovered myself removing the belt and sewing an elastic band within the again of the waistband area so as to make the belt unnecessary. I experience a bike. I hardly ever use shorts even after i jog. However again, I need to settle for no matter comes close to what I want. I got here across a running quick called Brooks Sherpa IV. I have a tendency to just go to clothes stores to have a look at designs and materials . What I did like about it was the lightweight materials. I simply puzzled why regular lengthy pants are not made of such a material. It could be wonderful for a hiking pant meant for extremely popular weather. The material was very much like a very very lightweight softshell. There's one from the North Face referred to as The Prolix jacket. I love softshell clothing. It is extremely lightweight, not excellent for cold weather by itself but you possibly can put layering under it. It is versatile and suits excellently and allows freedom of motion. But softshells are made for winter, spring and fall, not summer time. Additionally , why aren’t there any actually actually practically-designed vests? The Brook’s Sherpa IV would make a terrific summertime softshell. There must be a vest for touring. I find myself wishing for such a factor. It does not exist. Why not make considered one of lightweight and stretchy materials? I do know that I've said to much in this publish. I will stop for now. I hope I did not bore anybody. I've quite a lot of ideas for the higher design of clothes and I will most likely post once more with my concepts unless I'm instructed to not. I could have been a bit political too.